February 15, 2017 – Successful Strategies for Teaming, Joint Venturing, and Mentor Protégé Relationships: Recording Available
March 29, 2017 – How to Successfully Assert and Defend Protests
May 3, 2017 – Key Considerations in Post-Award Compensation: REAS and Claims
June 21, 2017 – The Ins and Outs of Federal Government Terminations
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2017 1PM – 2 PM
Successful Strategies for Teaming, Joint Venturing, and Mentor Protégé Relationships:
In today’s Federal contracting market, a growing number of government contracts are set-aside for various types of small businesses. It’s no surprise that, in this highly competitive environment, cooperative contractor relationships – including teaming and joint-venturing – are increasingly popular among small and large businesses alike. However, when done incorrectly, these types of relationships can have disastrous consequences, even destroying your small business eligibility. In this webinar we will teach you the right way to team and JV. We will cover the differences between teaming and joint venturing, avoiding common pitfalls and problems with teaming and joint venturing, and finally how to form a compliant team or JV. We will also touch upon how to draft an enforceable teaming agreement. Finally, we will discuss the SBA’s mentor protégé programs. Recent legal developments will also be covered. Recording available by following the link below:
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 2017 1PM – 2 PM
How to Successfully Assert and Defend Protests:
The source selection process is extremely competitive in today’s federal contracting market. As a result, many solicitations ultimately involve bid protests. These protests require complex legal analyses, under extremely short deadlines. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the protest process, including the legal issues commonly involved in that process, are vital to success. And a successful protest can mean the difference between getting a contract or losing that contract to a competitor. In this webinar, we will cover all aspects of the protest process. Experienced Federal contracting attorneys Maria Panichelli and Ed DeLisle will explain the differences between the various types of protests (Bid Protests, Size Protests, and Status Protests) and Size/Eligibility Investigations. Next, Maria and Ed will walk you through the debriefing process, as well as the who, what, when, where, why & how of filing a protest. Next we will cover the other side of protests, teaching you how to defend against, or even avoid, protests filed by frustrated competitors. Lastly, we will discuss size and status investigations, which address the size and eligibility of Small, 8(a), VO/SDVOSB, ED/WOSB and HUBZone businesses. Recent developments in law will also be addressed.
WEDNESDAY, MAY 3, 2017 1PM – 2 PM
Key Considerations in Post-Award Compensation: REAS and Claims:
As any Federal contractor will tell you, the contract award is only the beginning — performance presents a whole new series of challenges. The FAR and its supplementary regulations impose a host of obligations on contractors, and can impact the ways in which a contractor performs a contract. These rules and regulations also dictate the ways in which those contractors can seek compensation for unanticipated costs incurred on the job. In this webinar, experienced Federal Contracting attorneys Maria Panichelli and Ed DeLisle will teach you about two key strategies for seeking compensation when something goes wrong post-award: Requests for Equitable Adjustments, and Claims. We will discuss key differences between these two tools and discuss when to use which. We will also walk through the Contract Disputes Act claims and appeals process, and provide strategies for learning how to maximize a contractor’s chances of success when making claims against the Federal government.
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21, 2017 1PM – 2 PM
The Ins and Outs of Federal Government Terminations:
Government agencies have the ability to terminate their contracts for convenience (“T for C”), or for default (“T for D”). While a T for C does not imply that there was any fault on the part of the contractor, T for D means the government believes that the contractor failed to perform in accordance with the provisions of the contract. This distinction has other important implications as well. If terminated for convenience, a contractor can seek payment for the work done, and for any preparations made for the terminated portion of the contract. In contrast, if defaulted, it is possible that a contractor will actually owe the government money in connection with reprocurement. Getting terminated for default can also negatively impact a contractor’s ability to get future contracts. This webinar will cover the ins and outs of terminations. Learn all about T for Cs, the response process and seeking compensation. Learn also about T for Ds, how to challenge them, how to convert them to T for Cs, and how to deal with reprocurement claims.