A recently reported decision by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals underscores the necessity for bidders to review pre-bid data listed in the solicitation. In Mass Construction Group, Inc., ASBCA No. 55440, the contractor pursued a claim for a differing site condition, alleging that it had encountered a Type II condition, namely “unanticipated&rdquo
January 2007
Paul Perkins – A Valuable Resource for Federal Construction Contractors
There are many resources available to federal construction contractors, but there a few as useful as the services provided by Paul Perkins and his company, Construction Contract Specialists. We have had the privilege of working with Paul on a number of construction cases, and we continue to be impressed by his tireless efforts on…
The Variation in Estimated Quantity Clause and Requirements Contracts
After a hiatus in the posting of new decisions on its website dating back to October 2006, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals recently posted a series of new decisions. We will review and comment on the most interesting ones in upcoming articles and we begin today with the decision in Emerson Construction Co. …
Seminar on "How to Succeed in the New World of Federal Construction Contracting"
MATOC – IDIQ – “Best Value” – BRAC
These are the terms that contractors are hearing more and more and they are part of the rapidly changing world of construction contracting with the federal government. It is no longer enough to simply be the low bidder; now, in many federal procurements, it is the “best…
Upcoming BRAC Program Under Consideration By Congress
In order to implement the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Program (BRAC), Congress has a bill under consideration to fund recommendations in the amount of 5.43 billion dollars (H.R. 5385). Although this is a substantial amount of money, it is 400 million dollars less than the Administration requested. Nonetheless, once a funding bill …
Important New Rules on Electronically Stored Information
On December 1, 2006, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure became effective and made something that had already been established by court decisions very clear – that virtually every kind of electronically stored information (“ESI”) is discoverable in litigation. Government construction contractors, and their attorneys, need to be concerned about the preservation and disclosure of electronic information, including e-mail messages, voicemail messages, and any kind of a file stored on a computer. Unfortunately, as the information age makes an exponentially greater volume of information available, the seemingly easy storage of that information may actually be creating a vast minefield for the unwary.
Contractors need to be aware that even computer files that have been intentionally or inadvertently deleted are potentially discoverable. (Simply because data has been “deleted” from a hard drive does not necessarily mean that it cannot be retrieved). Courts may no longer accept the excuse that “the files were erased” if there was an obligation to preserve the data, or if the company failed to have an established ESI retention policy to assure the reasonable retention of electronic information. The new rules provide guidance and clarification on a number of topics related to electronic discovery (e-discovery), including the discoverability of data that is difficult to access, such as back-up tapes, the form in which electronically stored information should be produced, and how to deal with the inadvertent production of privileged information when large amounts of electronic data are produced.
One of the difficulties with the production of electronic data is that it is often harder to review than paper documentation because it involves the examination of large amounts of data stored on CDs, DVDs, floppy disks, hard drives, backup tapes, network servers, Internet backup services, and other storage devices. A company often finds it to be an overwhelming task to gather the data, and an equally daunting and costly task to electronically produce it. Electronic information on a complex matter involving technical data can occupy hundreds or even thousands of CDs (we are currently involved in exactly such a case).
It is important to recognize that the content of electronic information can be very different, and far less formal, than paper documentation. We have noticed that there is often a tendency to be careless when writing an e-mail message because of the informality, as compared to a letter. Contractor personnel are frequently very candid in e-mail messages and they may make off-the-cuff remarks that give the other side “ammunition” to discredit the contractor’s position. In addition, electronic information often contains “metadata” (underlying data that states when a document was created, modified, accessed, etc.). Without realizing it, or intending to do so, an electronic file may provide much more information than the author or the company ever intended, or was required, to preserve and that information may be a goldmine for the other side in litigation.Continue Reading Important New Rules on Electronically Stored Information
Skillful Project Management in the 21st Century
In the most recent edition of Defense AT&L, a magazine published by the Defense Acquisition University, author Wayne Turk discusses the skills that a competent project manager needs to possess in the 21st Century. In addition to people, financial and scheduling skills, Turk emphasizes seven attributes of a good project manager – patience…
Contracting Opportunities with the U.S. Department of State
The January 3, 2007 edition of ENR.com, an online publication of McGraw-Hill Construction, contains a webcast of the construction industry “matchmaking” session that the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) of the Department of State held with representatives of over 900 companies on October 10, 2006 in Arlington, Virginia. The webcast provides contractors with…
